Help us fight this terrible proposal--make a donation to the campaign today.
Click here


We need YOU to help us tell the truth about this bad amendment. Fill out a brief form and we'll contact you. Volunteer Now!

Request a Yard Sign

Welcome


Welcome to the No on 46 website. The No on 46 campaign is a statewide coalition of business, community, faith, student and education leaders who believe that carpetbaggers like Ward Connerly and organizations like the KKK should keep their divisive issues out of Colorado.

Check Your Registration Status

BREAKING NEWS
Mayor John Hickenlooper Speaks Out Against Amendment 46


"Amendment 46 undercuts Colorado and destroys years of progress in education, in health care, in work force development, all efforts that are important to Colorado’s hard working families and family owned business.”Colorado Governor Bill Ritter

For more information go to:
Governor Bill Ritter says Amendment 46 Bad for Colorado Business

Confusing Language & Deceptive Practices

Ward Connerly is using language directly out of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to eliminate equal opportunity in Colorado. His deceptive ballot language is the secret to his success. Further, Connerly's confusing language and deceptive circulators may have fraudulently obtained signatures by promising to protect opportunity programs, when his Amendment would do the opposite.

More >


Serious Consequences

The proposed Amendment 46 would alter the Colorado Constitution as it relates to civil rights. This would result in an unfavorable precedent, eroding equal opportunity and diversity practices that are important and valid concepts for business and the structure of our society.

This would cause our colleges and universities to worry about being sued for any program that seeks to increase diversity, or encourage women or minorities to pursue fields in which they are currently under-represented.

More >


Who is this lobbyist millionaire from California?

Connerly was accused of defrauding Michigan voters by using deceptive language and dirty signature-gathering tricks to confuse them into signing his petitions in 2006. In a lawsuit filed against Connerly after the Michigan signatures were submitted, Judge Arthur Tarnow ruled that "The Court finds that MCRI engaged in systematic voter fraud by telling voters that they were signing a petition supporting affirmative action. ..."

More >